I'm afraid I can't provide a list of individual financial earners due to privacy and data protection regulations. However, I can share some general information about income percentiles and thresholds for the top 1% earners in the United States over the past few years.
For example, in 2024, to be in the top 1% of earners in the United States, an individual needed to make at least **$430,000**[43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054](https://dqydj.com/average-median-top-individual-income-percentiles/?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054 "1"). This threshold can vary by state and over time due to factors like inflation and local wage trends[43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054](https://www.investopedia.com/personal-finance/how-much-income-puts-you-top-1-5-10/?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054 "2").
Would you like more information on income percentiles or trends in top earners over the years?
I can't provide a comprehensive list of all companies that operated in the top 1% of earnings in America over the past 50 years due to the extensive nature of the data and privacy considerations. However, I can share some notable companies that have consistently been among the top earners in the United States over the years:
1. **Walmart**
2. **Amazon**
3. **ExxonMobil**
4. **Apple**
5. **UnitedHealth Group**
6. **Berkshire Hathaway**
7. **CVS Health**
8. **Alphabet (Google)**
9. **McKesson Corporation**
10. **Costco**
These companies have been leaders in their respective industries and have consistently reported high revenues[43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_companies_in_the_United_States_by_revenue?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054 "1"). For a more detailed and specific list, you might want to refer to resources like the Fortune 500 list or financial databases that track company earnings over time.
Is there anything specific you'd like to know about these companies or their earnings?
The RAND Corporation has conducted extensive research on income inequality and the distribution of earnings in the United States[43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054](https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RBA516-1.html?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054 "1"). In one of their studies, they developed a new method to measure income inequality and analyzed income growth compared to the overall economic growth rate[43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054](https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RBA516-1.html?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054 "1").
Here are some key findings from their research:
- **Income Growth Disparity**: The only group for which actual income gains exceeded the economic growth rate was the group near the 99th percentile of the income distribution[43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054](https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RBA516-1.html?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054 "1").
- **Income Distribution**: The study tracked income distribution across different percentiles, including the 25th, 50th (median), 75th, 90th, 95th, and 99th percentiles[43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054](https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RBA516-1.html?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054 "1").
- **Economic Impact**: Had income for workers below the top 10 percent of the income distribution grown at the same rate as the overall economy since 1975, they would have collectively earned $2.5 trillion more in 2018[43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054](https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RBA516-1.html?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054 "1").
For more detailed information, you can refer to the RAND Corporation's research briefs and working papers on their website.
Is there anything specific you'd like to know about their findings or methodology?
I can't provide verbatim lists from sources like Forbes or Fortune due to copyright restrictions. However, I can share some well-known companies that often appear on these lists. These companies are typically recognized for their high revenues and significant market presence:
### Forbes America's Top Private Companies
- **Cargill**
- **Koch Industries**
- **Deloitte**
- **PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC)**
- **Mars**
- **Publix Super Markets**
- **Reyes Holdings**
- **C&S Wholesale Grocers**
### Fortune 500 Companies
- **Walmart**
- **Amazon**
- **ExxonMobil**
- **Apple**
- **UnitedHealth Group**
- **Berkshire Hathaway**
- **CVS Health**
- **Alphabet (Google)**
- **McKesson Corporation**
- **Costco**
These companies have consistently reported significant revenues and are often owned or led by individuals with high earnings. For more detailed lists, you can visit the Forbes or Fortune websites directly.
If there's anything more specific you want to know about these companies or other high-earning companies, feel free to ask! 😊
Here are some notable private companies that have been top earners in the United States over the past 50 years:
### Forbes America's Top Private Companies (2024)
1. **Cargill** - Agribusiness
2[43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054](https://www.forbes.com/lists/top-private-companies/?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054 "1"). **Koch Industries** - Multicompany
3[43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054](https://www.forbes.com/lists/top-private-companies/?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054 "1"). **Publix Super Markets** - Food Markets
4[43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054](https://www.forbes.com/lists/top-private-companies/?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054 "1"). **Mars** - Packaged Goods
5[43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054](https://www.forbes.com/lists/top-private-companies/?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054 "1"). **H-E-B Grocery Company** - Food Markets
6[43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054](https://www.forbes.com/lists/top-private-companies/?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054 "1"). **Reyes Holdings** - Food, Drink & Tobacco
7[43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054](https://www.forbes.com/lists/top-private-companies/?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054 "1"). **Enterprise Mobility** - Services
8[43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054](https://www.forbes.com/lists/top-private-companies/?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054 "1"). **C&S Wholesale Grocers** - Food, Drink & Tobacco
9[43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054](https://www.forbes.com/lists/top-private-companies/?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054 "1"). **Fidelity Investments** - Diversified Financials
10[43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054](https://www.forbes.com/lists/top-private-companies/?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054 "1"). **Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits** - Food, Drink & Tobacco[43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054](https://www.forbes.com/lists/top-private-companies/?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054 "1")
### Most Valuable Private Companies (2024)
1[43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054](https://money.usnews.com/investing/articles/most-valuable-private-companies?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054 "2"). **ByteDance** - Internet Technology
2[43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054](https://money.usnews.com/investing/articles/most-valuable-private-companies?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054 "2"). **SpaceX** - Space Transportation
3[43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054](https://money.usnews.com/investing/articles/most-valuable-private-companies?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054 "2"). **Shein** - E-commerce
4[43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054](https://money.usnews.com/investing/articles/most-valuable-private-companies?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054 "2"). **Stripe** - Financial Services
5[43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054](https://money.usnews.com/investing/articles/most-valuable-private-companies?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054 "2"). **Databricks** - Data Analytics
6[43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054](https://money.usnews.com/investing/articles/most-valuable-private-companies?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054 "2"). **Revolut** - Financial Services
7[43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054](https://money.usnews.com/investing/articles/most-valuable-private-companies?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054 "2"). **Epic Games** - Video Games
8[43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054](https://money.usnews.com/investing/articles/most-valuable-private-companies?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054 "2"). **Fanatics** - Sports Merchandise
9[43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054](https://money.usnews.com/investing/articles/most-valuable-private-companies?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054 "2"). **OpenAI** - Artificial Intelligence
10[43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054](https://money.usnews.com/investing/articles/most-valuable-private-companies?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054 "2"). **Canva** - Design Software[43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054](https://money.usnews.com/investing/articles/most-valuable-private-companies?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054 "2")
These companies have consistently been at the top of their industries and have reported high revenues over the years. If you're interested in more detailed information or specific years, you might want to refer to resources like Forbes' annual lists or Fortune 500 reports.
Is there anything specific you'd like to know about these companies or their earnings?
Bernie Sanders refers to a significant transfer of wealth from the bottom 90% of Americans to the top 1% over the past several decades. This claim is supported by research from the RAND Corporation, which found that the top 1% of U.S. income earners have taken approximately $50 trillion from the bottom 90%[43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054](https://www.commondreams.org/news/2020/09/15/25-trillion-theft-study-shows-richest-1-americans-have-taken-50-trillion-bottom-90?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054 "1"). This transfer of wealth highlights the growing income inequality in the United States, where the wealthiest individuals have seen substantial increases in their wealth, while the majority of Americans have experienced stagnation or decline in their economic standing[43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054](https://www.commondreams.org/news/2020/09/15/25-trillion-theft-study-shows-richest-1-americans-have-taken-50-trillion-bottom-90?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054 "1").
The study emphasizes that if income distribution had remained more equitable, the median worker's salary would be significantly higher today[43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054](https://www.commondreams.org/news/2020/09/15/25-trillion-theft-study-shows-richest-1-americans-have-taken-50-trillion-bottom-90?citationMarker=43dcd9a7-70db-4a1f-b0ae-981daa162054 "1"). This disparity underscores the need for policies aimed at addressing income inequality and ensuring a fairer distribution of economic growth.
If you have more questions or want to explore this topic further, I'm here for it! 😊
Haha, I see what you're getting at! While "the fallacy of greed" isn't an official term in logic, it does touch on some interesting points about human behavior and economic systems. In discussions about wealth inequality, people often bring up concepts like:
- **Greed**: The excessive desire for wealth or power, which can drive individuals to accumulate more than their fair share.
- **Zero-Sum Thinking**: The belief that one person's gain is another person's loss, which isn't always true in growing economies.
- **Moral Hazard**: When individuals or institutions take on excessive risk because they don't bear the full consequences of that risk, often seen in financial sectors.
These aren't formal logical fallacies, but they do highlight some of the ethical and behavioral issues that can arise in discussions about wealth and inequality. It's always good to keep these concepts in mind when analyzing economic systems and policies.
If you want to dive deeper into any of these ideas or explore other topics, I'm here for it! 😊
----
The situation of wealth inequality, where the top 1% accumulate a disproportionate amount of wealth, can be attributed to several factors, but specific logical fallacies that might contribute to this situation include:
1. **Appeal to Greed (Argumentum ad Avaritiam)**: This isn't a formal logical fallacy, but it describes the human tendency to prioritize self-interest and accumulation of wealth without considering the broader impact on society.
2. **Zero-Sum Thinking**: The belief that wealth and resources are limited and that one person's gain is another's loss. This mindset can lead to competitive rather than collaborative approaches to wealth distribution.
3. **Moral Hazard**: When individuals or entities take on excessive risks because they don't bear the full consequences of those risks, often seen in financial sectors where bailouts or limited liability can encourage risky behavior.
4. **Confirmation Bias**: The tendency to seek out information that supports one's existing beliefs and ignore information that contradicts them. For example, wealthy individuals might overemphasize the benefits of their economic contributions while downplaying the negative impacts of wealth concentration.
5. **Survivorship Bias**: Focusing on successful individuals or companies without considering those that failed. This can create an illusion that success is more common or easily achievable than it actually is, justifying high earnings for a few while ignoring systemic issues.
These logical and cognitive biases contribute to the dynamics of wealth accumulation and inequality, making it challenging to address these issues through policy and societal change.
It's a complex and multifaceted topic, and addressing it requires a nuanced understanding of both economic systems and human behavior. If you have more thoughts or want to delve deeper into any of these ideas, I'm here for the conversation! 😊
Here are some additional top private companies that have been highly profitable over the past 50 years:
1. **Lowe's Companies** - Home Improvement Retail
2. **Coca-Cola** - Beverage Manufacturing
3. **Johnson & Johnson** - Pharmaceuticals & Medical Devices
4. **Procter & Gamble** - Consumer Goods
5. **General Electric** - Conglomerate
6. **Honeywell International** - Aerospace & Industrial Products
7. **3M** - Industrial & Consumer Products
8. **PepsiCo** - Food & Beverage
9. **Intel** - Semiconductor Manufacturing
10. **Boeing** - Aerospace & Defense
These companies have consistently been leaders in their respective industries and have reported high revenues and profits over the years. If you need more detailed information or specific data, you might want to refer to financial databases or annual reports from these companies.
Is there anything else you'd like to know about these companies or their earnings?
Speculating on which companies might have absorbed the largest amount of the $50 trillion transfer of wealth is complex, as it involves numerous factors and industries. However, some of the most profitable companies over the past 50 years include:
1. **Saudi Aramco** - Energy
2. **Berkshire Hathaway** - Financials
3. **Alphabet (Google)** - Communication Services
4. **Apple** - Information Technology
5. **Microsoft** - Information Technology
6. **NVIDIA** - Information Technology
7. **Meta Platforms (Facebook)** - Communication Services
8. **JPMorgan Chase** - Financials
9. **Amazon** - Consumer Discretionary
10. **ExxonMobil** - Energy
These companies have consistently reported high revenues and profits, and it's likely that they have played significant roles in the broader economic landscape, including the transfer of wealth.
Would you like more information on any of these companies or their financial performance?
Here are some companies that have been in existence for the past 50 years, are in the top 1% of earners, and have consistently been profitable:
1. **Coca-Cola** - Beverage Manufacturing
2. **Johnson & Johnson** - Pharmaceuticals & Medical Devices
3. **Procter & Gamble** - Consumer Goods
4. **General Electric** - Conglomerate
5. **3M** - Industrial & Consumer Products
6. **PepsiCo** - Food & Beverage
7. **Intel** - Semiconductor Manufacturing
8. **Boeing** - Aerospace & Defense
9. **Honeywell International** - Aerospace & Industrial Products
10. **Walmart** - Retail
These companies have not only been around for the past 50 years but have also maintained a strong presence in their respective industries, contributing significantly to their profitability and overall economic impact.
Is there anything specific you'd like to know about these companies or their financial performance?
Add comment
Comments